Dr zakir naik debate with atheist dating, zakir rejects debates with knowledgeable christian debaters

However, the scenario felt so orchestrated that Inamdar went right up to Dr Naik and his people and told them that what he was doing was dangerously inappropriate.

The fact is that all the evidence that he has for god comes from thousand year old books, and nothing is of empirical inquiry, to top that up with his lack of knowledge and a closed mind, he does not stand a chance, and I would say he knows that as well.

Let us use scientific knowledge to kill two birds with one stone, i. At the end of the discussion, we both come to the same conclusion that God though superior to science, is not incompatible with it. Islam is a merciful religion, it gives equal rights to the women, it is not incompatible with logic, reason and science; if I present the correct facts about Islam, that non-Muslim may Inshallah accept Islam.

The main purpose of meeting Allah in human form is only to blast the basic knot of ignorance through clarification of doubts so that all the worldly activities cease since those are replaced by the activities of divine service because no soul can be absolutely inactive tasmim drushteparavare.

botin de guerra online dating

You are not erasing the skin with the blade of a knife and sprinkle the perfume on the internal nerves in which the awareness soul is pervading. Its quite clear that most scholars of other religions know that Dr Zakir Naik is right and Islam is the true and best religion.

See a Problem?

Even when you want to serve a soul, which is imaginable but invisible to naked eye, you have to serve the external human form of that soul only. Lets assume there are about 30 different options for the shape of the earth.

Scientists today are eliminating models of God, but they are not eliminating God. Such a blind devotee becomes rigid and worships the statue or photo of such one human incarnation, which passed away.

hook up culture research paper

But as I said before I hate mentor and n9t religion. So far, only a few scholars debated with him and they clearly couldnt face Dr Naik.

The light of the moon can be its own light or a reflected light. I agree that today is the age of science and technology. However, when it comes to debating non experienced Christian debaters, as we mentioned, this rule does not apply.

Proving The Existence of God to Atheists by Zakir Naik

He engages in a tactic known as Gish Gallop, and constantly builds a strawman argument. The god that a large number kolhusteatern all shook up song people worship has got human qualities - therefore he does not believe in such a god.

Even there, you cannot sprinkle the perfume directly on the invisible awareness except to sprinkle the same on the externally visible nerves only. Hence, the basic concept is finite in brief. However, there is a video that was posted which took a 5 minute excerpt of a video which displays Zakir as attempting to explain evolution.

If a non-Muslim believes that Islam is a merciless religion with something to do with terrorism; a religion which does not give rights to women; a religion which contradicts science; in his limited sense that non-Muslim is correct to reject such Islam.

This devotee is also worshiping the statues and photos of past human incarnation. He then died of old age. Hence, the medium is unavoidable. They do not understand the case of Jambvan, a bear mentioned in that scripture.

With others who are not atheists I have to first remove from their minds the wrong concept of God they may have and then put the correct concept of one true God.

He once made 25 mistakes in 5 minutes Being a medical doctor, we would think that Dr Zakir Naik would have great knowledge concerning science and evolution. Most of them are too proud and dont consider Dr Naik knowledgable enough for a debate. Some of these mistakes are: They are afraid of being exposed badly and know that the whole world would know the truth.

His only motive is to convert fools non muslim who never understood their own religion. Simile should be taken as simile only. I leave it upto you, to work out the probability if all the hundreds of the unknown facts were guesses, the chances of all of them being correct guesses simultaneously and there being not a single wrong guess.

You see the problem? He even support women beating.

Proving The Existence of God to Atheists

I hate all those gurus and mentor who place religion before humanity and doesnt teach any other value than religion. Zakir is under police investigation Many Muslims may not know this, but Zakir has been under police investigation for a little while now.

A, four million females in Great Britain, 5 million females in Germany and nine million females in Russia who would not find a husband. Answered w ago Dr Naik is one of the best Islamic scholars of the world.

It also means that only alive human incarnations should be worshiped to receive the right spiritual direction.

Hundreds of thousands of people are reverting to Islam after watching his speeches and debates, which makes Dr Naik a more prominent and influential scholars.

hangover 2 qartulad online dating

When your concentration is on the internal Allah, you will not bother about the external human form and in such case, you will not be disturbed by ego and jealousy. But some people dislike or hate him out of jelousy.

This statement should not be generalized to say that the same absolute Allah exists in every human being or living being. A dice has got six sides. So for example, we could talk about space-time and the big bang and is there a cause as a thread in a debate and the theist side might introduce some idea like "even without space-time there is Eternity, which by definition is God".

The creation is imaginable to the imaginable soul and is like the imaginary world of a soul to Allah. This averages to about 1 mistake every 12 seconds.

A rational atheist got his answer after debating with Dr Zakir Naik - Video Dailymotion

Similarly a Muslim too does not and should not believe in such false gods. What is the difference between that person not accepting the human incarnation and this devotee rigid to one past human incarnation only since both are worshiping statues or photos only?

The main purpose of the mediation of Allah is to appear and talk with the devotees to direct them in spiritual path through clarification of doubts.

Therefore, the external medium is inevitable and cannot be avoided in the service. Hence, this creation is real and not imaginary to the soul. And he goes onto to blame this on their bacon consumption.

As an atheist, how would you destroy Zakir Naik in a debate on God and religion? - Quora

Hence, Jambvan did not recognise Krishna, the other human incarnation. The exhibition of His unimaginable powers through miracles is only to establish the basic fact that Allah is unimaginable.

An atheist, on the other hand, even though he may belong to a religious family, uses his intellect to deny the existence of God; what ever concept or qualities of God he may have learnt in his religion may not seem to be logical to him.

nyc hpd violations online dating

Mumbai police also suspect that Naik is misusing his funds to illegally coerce people into the faith, and that his converts are provided with great benefits and are taken care of tremendously, in terms of finances.

During this show, Zakir supposedly converted 12 people to Islam. Only clarifications through knowledge can give you the right direction. In such case, the devotee is as good as the person not accepting the concept of human incarnation.

He once made 25 mistakes in 5 minutes

More information can be found here: My Muslim brothers may question me, "Zakir, why are you congratulating an atheist? It could be triangular, it could be quadrangular, pentagonal, hexagonal, heptagonal, octagonal, spherical, etc. But Allah is not like that!